I'm going to forward my findings to Ben Armstrong (i.e. the "Virtual PC Guy" at Microsoft) for analysis, however, I already have a theory on the source of the excessive CPU utilization. For starters, it seems isolated the client VMs, both of which are running a high-resolution monitoring agent (DMS Clarity Metrics Tracker). This agent makes frequent calls to PDH, WMI and the Registry, and I'm guessing that Virtual PC 2007 is generating a lot more overhead when processing these calls than Virtual Server. The agent also uses a set of high-resolution timer objects that likewise seems to give Virtual PC fits.
As a simple test, I tried disabling the agents on each VM. CPU utilization for virtualpc32.exe immediately to dropped to below 10%. Case closed.
Bottom Line: For testing applications that use high-resolution timers, or that make frequent calls to certain system libraries, Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 does a much better job of handling what should normally be a very fast, lightweight operation. And with VMRC Plus, you don't have to sacrifice usability in order to reap the rewards of better real-time application support under Virtual Server.
4 comments:
Hello,
I am currently experiencing the same issue. I have Virtual PC 2007 running two Guests. Initially, everything was running reasonably well. But suddenly, CPU usage is at 100% almost 95% of the time. VERY Slow to do anything. What baffles me is that it worked well for 2-3 weeks. Then suddenly, the CPU usage increased, with no real change in what the Host or Guests are processing.
How can I track this down and fix this?
I can vouch also that this is a problem. On a dual core machine, the VPC only uses a single core and that core is completely chewed up (@ 100%) the entire time the VPC is running. I've atcually had to switch to VMWare as a result.
Is there any update about this. Having this problem and it's quite frustrating even though host machine has a dual core, only one of the CPU gets flogged by VPC 2007...
Not fair :). In my own case, Vmware is not an option because I hate to duplicate applications in my development environment. That's costly too.
Similar problem. Just using a Win98SE ISO startup image and the CPU load is a steady 50%. I'm using an Intel Core2 Duo at 2.66 GHz. This load is unsustainable.
Post a Comment