tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post6056888504542042722..comments2023-05-11T13:11:27.968+04:00Comments on exo.blog: (WCPI): 85% of Win 7 PCs are UnderperformingResearch Staffhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13688739704799598919noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-85774518186645891732010-02-24T16:15:03.339+04:002010-02-24T16:15:03.339+04:00Could you perform this test also
Windows Server 20...Could you perform this test also<br />Windows Server 2008 (R2)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-42084542789947689772010-02-19T23:51:04.604+04:002010-02-19T23:51:04.604+04:00whoever posted this article is a grade A+ idiot an...whoever posted this article is a grade A+ idiot and needs to go back to school to keep up with the times.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04798475214100077271noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-14609560583874658212010-02-19T19:26:38.551+04:002010-02-19T19:26:38.551+04:00A 10Ghrz chip would require too much power and pro...A 10Ghrz chip would require too much power and produce too much heat to be a viable consumer chip. The theory with multicore computing is with mulithreaded apps, which is cheaper and faster than any single core solution.<br /><br />just fyiUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11091357220468691184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-75112008432864182452010-02-19T19:03:19.036+04:002010-02-19T19:03:19.036+04:00This post is terribly, terribly wrong. You have al...This post is terribly, terribly wrong. You have all just ousted your-selfs as idiots on a lot of tech blogs lol. Just saw this a second time on ars.Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05317049149313858705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-41873012675203889812010-02-19T11:25:55.340+04:002010-02-19T11:25:55.340+04:00SuperFetch was discussed back in early 2005 when i...SuperFetch was discussed back in early 2005 when it was release with a Vista Beta.<br /><br />In other news, quad core 2.66ghz cpu not as fast as 10ghz chip on single threaded apps. Intel and AMD are trying to screw us over with useless multi-core chips.Benjiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00768299018093234025noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-42669774223385760052010-02-19T10:13:22.061+04:002010-02-19T10:13:22.061+04:00This is an absolutely worthless article. Windows 7...This is an absolutely worthless article. Windows 7 utilizes memory that isn't actively being used for its Superfetch algorithms, that preload frequently used programs and such, so when you click on their icon to start them, startup is basically instantaneous. Windows 7 learns (like Vista did) what you do most commonly and predicts your actions. If you stray from those common occurrences, Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01179090899909907580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-52094478448597147072010-02-19T08:13:38.259+04:002010-02-19T08:13:38.259+04:00You people are idiots. How can you know so little ...You people are idiots. How can you know so little about how Windows 7 works? <br /><br />There is a difference between cached and used memory. Check the "Available" memory, that will give the real amount of ram that your system has free to applications. <br /><br />Either you are the most incompetent company ever, or you are trying to deceive people in order to sell them some bullshit &Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03011631708488348658noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-64292974707292184622010-02-19T01:49:28.868+04:002010-02-19T01:49:28.868+04:00There is so much wrong with this article I don'...There is so much wrong with this article I don't even know where to start.<br /><br />Obviously it's not "Windows" using 3GB of RAM. That doesn't even make sense. It's applications that are using up this extra memory. And I can tell you EXACTLY why user's of Windows 7 have a higher memory consumption compared to other operating systems. It's because Windows 7'Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16777132324969805804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-25340165397195605672010-02-18T22:25:04.067+04:002010-02-18T22:25:04.067+04:00Better check your facts.
The overwhelming consensu...Better check your facts.<br />The overwhelming consensus is that you are factually incorrect at a very minimum.fishyfoolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09851240131735435332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-43004145145865359562010-02-18T18:41:53.206+04:002010-02-18T18:41:53.206+04:00I don't follow your assessment. So Windows 7 ...I don't follow your assessment. So Windows 7 is more efficient in its use of memory, leaving less free. Isn't the point of memory to use it? And since when wasn't virtual memory a part of a modern OS?<br /><br />I think this is worth further discussion.<br /><br />FrankFrank Bulkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02004215342995023858noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-19318054584614825942010-02-18T18:39:42.751+04:002010-02-18T18:39:42.751+04:00You guys have generated alot of confusion because ...You guys have generated alot of confusion because of this post and an article in Computer World.<br />Do you understand how Superfetch works?<br />Read here: http://www.osnews.com/story/21471/SuperFetch_How_it_Works_Myths<br /><br />Please do not jump to conclusions about your data without understanding how Windows 7 use RAM.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08366813644381052171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-39583529936957165402010-02-18T17:20:10.395+04:002010-02-18T17:20:10.395+04:00My goodness, and you claim to be a CIO? You don...My goodness, and you claim to be a CIO? You don't even know how Windows 7 records memory in use and how it differs from the process used under Windows XP it seems. Do us all a favour. Read up on it. And get a new job. Maybe flipping burgers, because your method of recording memory usage in Windows 7 boxes is seriously flawed, flawed enough to be nothing more than a lie.Evil_Merlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10856582216847707602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-60644653494993843202010-02-18T17:14:17.454+04:002010-02-18T17:14:17.454+04:00You do know that you are bloody idiots, right? You...You do know that you are bloody idiots, right? You managed to get to the front page of slashdot, where thousands of people get to see how little you know about win7.<br /><br />CACHING. Just because the ram is in use doesn't mean that it's overloaded.Random Aliashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03030518073367846965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1285849328344730084.post-6179321395531629312010-02-18T15:53:59.047+04:002010-02-18T15:53:59.047+04:00Have you not considered the different memory manag...Have you not considered the different memory management and caching approach in Vista and Windows 7, as described <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/09/why-does-vista-use-all-my-memory.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>?Dimitrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02537374751254397937noreply@blogger.com